ARCHITECTURE PROGRAMMING DIAGRAMS FULL
ARCHITECTURE PROGRAMMING DIAGRAMS DOWNLOAD

This is often the case when you develop an interface which fits exactly the format which the other party is expecting without alteration, typically when an integration already exists and this new system is simply replacing a direct copy of what was already there. The second box type in grey is a component someone else owns, but no development is required at the other end of the to allow the transfer the data. you own the deployment or change to this component), this maybe new or it could be a change to an existing component. The first box type in dark blue box is a component which is owned and is specifically part of your project scope (i.e. The different colours of the components do have a meaning and each box should be given a meaningful name. If you have classes, and operators you are at too low a level for this kind of diagram, that is when you should switch to other diagramming techniques like UML. On these kinds of diagrams you should not need to decompose to too fine a level of detail.

I have a separate diagram just to describe the SAP stack and which SAP components are used. Have a look in the example presentation with this post. If you abstract components like this you should consider adding another diagram which decomposes these more complex components to a further level of detail down. I have chosen this level of decomposition for the specific purpose of this diagram. For the purpose of this overview diagram is simpler to abstract SAP into one box although really is has many components of interest. Look at the SAP box for instance – SAP is made up of many components like the database, SAP GUI, SAP NetWeaver, SAP Portal, etc. Just a note here, when you create Architecture Overview Diagrams you will have to choose the level of decomposition. The arrows shows the existence of a data flow between the systems, and again each data flow is uniquely numbered for ease of reference. Each rectangular box represents a component and each component is uniquely numbered for ease of reference both when talking about this diagram but also when you create other artifacts you can reference the component using this number. This architecture shows an SAP system communicating to a number of other systems. I will start off with this relatively simple example (click to enlarge)

ARCHITECTURE PROGRAMMING DIAGRAMS DOWNLOAD

Any suggestions for improvement are welcome! I have also provided a download of the example discussed here – Click here to download the example set of Architecture Overview Diagrams – this also includes the additional information I recommend goes with the diagrams. I do not know of any well thought through alternative.

In my current role as Chief Architect of the second largest project in IBM Globally we have a project budget in the half billion dollar range, we have hundreds of components and interfaces and the diagramming technique explained below is the one which I have enforced throughout the project, we successfully delivered our targets in 2007 and are on track for this year. This format has stood me in good stead for a number of large multi year projects with budgets from $10 to $50 million a year upwards.

ARCHITECTURE PROGRAMMING DIAGRAMS FULL

**** Click here to download the full example ****Īfter interest in the last post on architecture diagrams I am writing this description of the architecture diagram notation I have been using for several years. Tags: architecture diagram notation, architecture diagrams, architecture notation, architecture overview diagrams, cheats architecture diagram notation, solution architecture, technology IT Architecture Diagrams II – Recommended Format and Notation AugPosted by Chris Eaton in communications, IT Architecture, methodology, methods, SAP.

Architecture programming diagrams